Tweeting the Passion of Christ
It appears that Trinity Church in Manhattan's financial district has set up a Twitter account -- @twspassionplay -- to perform the Passion Play via 140-character tweets. This offends me like few other things, because it treats religious ideas as so much product to be hawked. This gives an unfortunate new meaning to Christ's followers. (Thanks to a nameless friend for this last line.)
And so, I was inspired to write the following parody ...
not of the Passion Play, but of this asinine idea of moving everything to new media, whether appropriate or not, and selling religion. For those who insist on taking this as an attack on Christian idea, don't bother leaving a message here – go talk to Trinity Church. They're the ones trying to make personal gain off this.
@Narrator: Last Supper
@Christ: Dig in. #apostles
@Christ: Bread, anyone? #apostles
@Christ: Pass the wine. #apostles
@Luke: @ Jesus Good wine. What vintage?
@Christ: @Luke Five minute ago.
@Peter: Pass the potatoes. #apostles
@Judas: @Peter Sorry, took the last one.
@Christ: One of you will betray me. #apostles
@Peter: @Christ Is it I?
@Andrew: @Christ Is it I?
@BigJames: @Christ Is it I?
@LittleJames: @Christ Is it I?
@John: @Christ Is it I?
@Philip: @Christ Is it I?
@Bartholomew: @Christ Is it I?
@Matthew: @Christ Is it I?
@Thomas: @Christ Is it I?
@Thaddeus: @Christ Is it I?
@Simon: @Christ Is it I?
@Christ: Nice grammar. #apostles
@Judas: @Christ Is it I?
@Christ: RT @Judas: @Christ Is it I?
@Peter: @Christ I'll go to prison with you.
@Christ: @Peter Oh, yeah. Right.
@Christ: I'm short on cash. Anyone have the tip? #apostles
@Judas: @Christ Not now, but I will soon.
@Christ: I'm going for a walk. Anyone else? #apostles
@Narrator: Garden of Gethsemane:
@Christ: @Father Do I hafta?
@Christ: @Father Hello?
@Christ: Stop snoring! #apostles
@Judas: @Christ [smooch]
@Christ: @Judas Eeewww!
@RomanSoldier1: @Christ Time's up.
@Christ: @RomanSoldier1 Yes, I've already heard.
@Narrator: Christ Judged
@Crowd1: @Christ Guilty!
@Crowd2: @Christ Pfffft.
@Crowd3: @Peter Aren't you a friend of his?
@Peter: @Crowd3 Sorry, don't know him.
@Crowd4: @Peter I've seen you with him.
@Peter: @Crowd4 Nope.
@Crowd5: @Peter Me too.
@Peter: @Crowd5 Said I don't know him!
@Rooster: Cockadoodle doo.
@Peter: Oops.
@Pilate: I don't see a problem. #crowd
@Priest: @Pilate He's a troublemaker.
@Pilate: Send him to @Herod. #crowd
@Herod: @Christ Come on … just a *little* miracle?
@Herod: Take him back to @Pilate. #crowd
@Pilate: @Christ Sorry, dude.
@Narrator: Christ on the Cross
@RomanSoldier2: Nail him down. #soldiers
@Christ: Ow!
@Christ: @Father Forgive them. They know not what they tweet.
Labels: religion, satire, Twitter
Random House Banned from Literary Prize
The Langum Charitable Trust, which awards annual prizes for historical fiction and legal history or biography, has
blacklisted Random House. No book of that publisher will be able to win one of the prizes because the
company cancelled production of Sherry Jones's novel The Jewel of Medina because management feared angering Muslims. As the company announced, it had sent out advanced copies and received "cautionary advice not only that the publication of this book might be offensive to some in the Muslim community, but also that it could incite acts of violence by a small, radical segment."
In other words, Random House caved out of fear. Would some Muslims act in that way? Oh, I'm sure, just as you've seen supposedly Christian groups attack doctors who performed abortions. Jones's book imagined the life of Muhhamed's youngest wife. It may have been fine literature or utter crap - I don't know and likely never will. She's free to seek publication elsewhere, but I wonder whether there was a string that she'd have to return the $100,000 advance she received, and who else at this point is going to pay that sort of money?
The damage is done. Not only has Random House essentially told radical Muslims, and any other group that might threaten to take some action to supress a book, that it will do their bidding, but has helped create an atmosphere in which such people will think that if it worked on one publisher, it will work on any. That's why I have to applaud the words of the Langum Charitable Trust:
"That form of cowardice will only lead to more and more of this form of self-censorship and is an attack on the integrity of literary publication," Langum continued. "We must stand up to it, in whatever ways are available to us. The form that was available to our small foundation was to put Random House out of the running for our prizes."
It's not that I think that creating a novel based on religious figures and a likely complete imagination of what people and cultures were like is necessarily something I would want to read, but it ought to be possible to be published. Giving in to censorship is always a bad idea.
Labels: censorship, Islam, Muslims, Random House, religion
Serenity Missing in Considering Serenity Prayer
The Serenity Prayer is short and insightful, whose opening is well known:
God grant me the serenity
to accept the things I cannot change;
the courage to change the things I can;
and the wisdom to know the difference.
Prostestant theologian Reinhold Niebuhr claimed to have written it, but there seems to be a
significant question of whether he was right:
Now, a law librarian at Yale, using new databases of archival documents, has found newspaper clippings and a book from as far back as 1936 that quote close versions of the prayer. The quotations are from civic leaders all over the United States — a Y.W.C.A. leader in Syracuse, a public school counselor in Oklahoma City — and are always, interestingly, by women.
Some refer to the prayer as if it were a proverb, while others appear to claim it as their own poetry. None attribute the prayer to a particular source. And they never mention Reinhold Niebuhr.
Labels: quotations, religion
Audience Block Walks Out on Monologist - and Tosses Water
Some so-called Christian group (sorry, but this doesn't seem like the action of real Christians to me) apparently got up en masse during a performance by monologist Mike Daisey, walked out while the show was running, and one of them
dumped water all over Daisey's notes. According to the report, no one in the group would engage with him, but they ran away. Bullies generally do when really challenged. Here's a
video of the incident on YouTube.
Labels: censorship, Daisey, monolog, religion, theater
