Wednesday, October 31, 2007

 

Review: Nalgene Food Containers

UPDATE: I'm leaving the review below as is, but I came across information suggesting that the plastic Nalgene is made of could cause health problems. Here's a link to the post.

For years, I've been a fan of Nalgene water bottles for hiking. Not only can you depend on the screw-tops of the tough containers staying tight and not leaking in your backpack, but aromas and off-putting flavors from the hard plastic don't leach into the liquid. A quick look on the company's web site shows that it's been in the lab container business for years, and it would follow that having non-reactive containers would be mandatory.

So I was delighted to hear from the company's PR reps that it now has food storage containers. I wouldn't be surprised if they developed out of camping use, and that's fine. I put some water in one, screwed down the top, and kept turning it upside - all stayed dry. The products aren't cheap. For example, a hard plastic 16 ounce jar with screw top will set you back at least $5.50, and a quart container is over $8. However, my experience suggests that the products will last a good long time, and, if need be, you can get replacement caps. I expect these products to get heavy use in our kitchen.

We also got some of the company's tumblers, which have an outer sleeve and inner container. Separating them the first time is pretty hard, and we were sure we were cracking the tumblers, but we weren't. You can use the inner and outer parts as two cups, invert one onto the other for a shaker, or leave them nested to have an insulated cold cup. Unfortunately, the tumblers don't stack well at all, and so storing these is going to be challenging - a pity, as it's a flaw in an otherwise interesting design for home use.

Also, there were two water bottles. One had a Filter For Good label co-branded with Brita. The idea is to encourage the use of filtered water in reusable containers rather than buying bottled water, but there's no filter included, so you might as well buy a filter and any old water bottle. The OTG bottle is pretty cool - there's a built-in sipping cap that closes off to keep from dripping and the shape is appealing and easy to hold.

Furthermore, you can purchase all products at the company's web site with no shipping charges, which is nice for a change in online shopping.

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, October 30, 2007

 

Review: Eagle Mills All-Purpose Flour

The PR people for ConAgra Foods sent a bag of the company's Eagle Mills All-Purpose Flour, which is supposedly closer to whole wheat than regular white flour, but with a milder taste and the texture of the later. I just baked some bread with it and think it's potentially got a place in the kitchen, though isn't going to be the eating habit savior that the marketing people want to portray.

Eagle Mills is actually a blend of 70% white flour and a blend of 30% Ultragrain. Don't be surprised if you haven't yet heard of the latter. It's a proprietary preparation of ConAgra and the major ingredient behind Sara Lee Soft & Smooth 100% Whole Wheat Bread, which I haven't yet tried. It seems to be some processed form of whole wheat flour, but milled to a state where is doesn't have the textural roughness you'd ordinarily expect.

One of the claims that ConAgra Foods, manufacturers of Ultragrain flour, makes is that the product is mroe nutritious than "unenriched unbleached flour." You can see their comparitive data here. The figures for refined, unenriched wheat flour and traditional whole grain wheat flour come from the USDA national nutrient database (which I double-checked). Notice that the values for Ultragrain and whole wheat are the same? (Also, notice that they compare to unenriched flour, versus, say, enriched bread flour, but the differences between those two aren't all that big.)

As I read through everything, I realized that Eagle Mills isn't a wonder concoction bringing the nutritional benefits of whole wheat to everything. This is a blend, but typically you'd have a ratio of maybe 60%/40% of regular white to whole wheat. You could even push that up more, I've found. However, some things like dietary fiber will be double using Eagle Mills compared to regular white. Also, if you're baking bread, you might find that you let a bit less rise from this. I think they blended the Ultragrain with regular white and not bread flour. Normally, I'd blend whole wheat with a bread flour to increase the gluten content and get more rise in the final product. Also, if you want the nuttier taste of whole wheat, Eagle Mills is not the way to go. But if you'd like to boost the nutritional value of something while trying to get as close to a white flour taste and texture aesthetic as possible, give this product a try.

Labels: , , , , ,

Monday, October 29, 2007

 

Strange News from the Food Front (10/29/07)

A weekly round-up of food and drink oddities:

Labels: ,

Friday, October 26, 2007

 

More on the Seinfeld and Lapine Cookbooks

Once again I found an anonymous comment, this time on the todo over whether Seinfeld plagiarized Lapine's cookbook. To anonymously try posting a snipping comment to this blog is to invite being mocked in the worst way possible: by the juxtaposition of rambling opinion with fact. (And I'm guessing that the person here is somehow connected with Lapine.) Here is the post:

TWO books which are:

both cookbooks
shown to the same publisher
in the same year
with the same UNIQUE recipes
on the same UNIQUE cooking concept
by authors who live in the same city
with nearly IDENTICAL book covers
both pitched to OPRAH

IS JUST A COINCIDENCE. No way, I smell a rat!
Now let's bring in the fact. First, as any author who has experienced commercial publishing for any length of time can tell you, having two people come up with the same idea at about the same time is normal. When you've got something like 180,000 new books published every year in the US, and many of the ideas are driven by common cultural values and events, then you're going to have a fair amount of duplication.

The books don't have "the same unique recipes." I direct the poster and readers to this level-headed article in Slate. Here's an interesting paragraph:

Spend 10 minutes comparing the Seinfeld and Lapine books, and you won't be able to seriously contend that there is plagiarism. (And in all the articles I've found about this tempest in a teapot, not one has pointed to a specific example of plagiarism.) Sure, the two books are based on the same unremarkable, unoriginal idea. And a handful of recipes employ some of the same obvious tricks (mostly based on hue, such as hiding sweet potato puree in a grilled cheese sandwich or spinach in brownies). But the books are quite different. For example, Seinfeld's recipe, titled "Mashed Potatoes," calls for simple cauliflower puree. Lapine's recipe for "Mystery Mashed Potatoes" specifies "White Puree," which is a separate recipe earlier in the book that consists of cauliflower, zucchini, and lemon juice. In a table comparing recipes, a New York Times blog notes that both books contain "Peanut Butter and Jelly Muffins" without noting that, among several other differences, Seinfeld calls for carrot puree while Lapine calls for "orange puree," based on sweet potatoes with the addition of carrots. Not that either trick is a revelation—fleshy vegetables like sweet potatoes and carrots have long been ingredients in cakes, pies, breads, and muffins.
As the article also notes, Chris Fisk's Sneaky Veggies was another book on the same theme. However, it came out before either Seinfeld's or Lapine's - and the time it takes to produce books would pretty much eliminate the chance that Seinfeld or her publisher (or the list of people involved, as the Slate piece notes) could have seen Lapine's book, copied it, and gotten to press in the time they had. The publisher may have seen Lapine's proposal - along with hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of others at the same time - but it's unlikely that there would have been enough detail in recipes to allow true copying, even if they recipes were identical.

As I mentioned in my other entry on this subject, hiding vegetables in other foods for kids is hardly a novel cooking concept. There are web recipes that predate all of these titles, and I bet if I spent, oh, about 15 minutes in our extensive cookbook collection, I could find similar recipes. Nearly identical book covers? That has nothing to do with the authors, as they have virtually no say in what is on the cover. (You're lucky if the publisher even asks you - though it looks like I will get to shoot the cover photo of the dessert book I'm currently putting together, which should be fun. Particularly when I get to eat the main prop.)

And both books pitched to Oprah! Oh, my, now there's the smoking gun. Both publishers or their PR people pitched these books to the Oprah Winfrey Show - along with the other 50,000 books that people were pushing. This is like saying there is something suspicious because two separate people actually have to breathe to exist. Getting on Oprah is one of the biggest - and most standard - ways to get significant book sales. What did you expect these people to do? Not even try?

To be fair, sometimes publishers do questionable things. I've known writers who had a publisher kick them off projects, which they had created (one got a fair sum of money in a law suit), or who had a publisher offer a look at a similar proposal (the writer turned that opportunity down). But to create a duplicate book? Nah, it would be too much work for the publisher to bother with. I realize that conspiracy theories may be more fun, but that's fiction, a topic I cover in my En Words blog.

Labels: , , ,

Thursday, October 25, 2007

 

Review: Donatella Pasta Sauces

Jarred pasta sauces rarely catch my attention because there are already so many of them, a number of which are quite good. You can add another name to the latter: Donatella. That's the moniker both of the company and of owner Donatella Arpaia, who is also a Manhattan restaurateur. Her PR firm sent some sauces and a bottle of olive oil. I'll focus on the sauces, as getting various types of oil from virtually anywhere in the world has become comparatively easy.

The "Essential Sauce" is a passata di pomodoro, which translates as tomato puree. That's a bit over simplified. These are fresh San Marzano tomatoes cooked with celery, onion, basil, and garlic, all of which they claim are also fresh and not dried. Even without simmering the sauce for ten minutes with some olive oil, as they suggest, it has a marvelous tomato flavor, napping the pasta well, and can become a foundation for sauce variations, as you like.

The ready-to-serve sauces are puttanesca (prostitute's sauce, incorporating olives, capers, and some anchovy), marinara (garlic and basil), and arrabiata (red peppers with some garlic). They're all solid flavors, though I would have liked a bit more kick in the puttanesca, as I'm used to it with the traditional capers and some hot peppers. But you should be able to open any of these and expect a decent covering for your pasta.

And now for the "but." These sauces carry a hefty price. Go to the web site and you find that the Essential Sauce is $10 for one jar. Ouch. That almost makes the jarred trio of marinara, puttanesca, and arrabiata seem reasonable at $24, or $8 a jar. I tried providing a Boston address to see what shipping would be to someplace other than my neck of the boondocks, but I got the following message: "No Shipping Rates available for your shipping address." Does that mean free? Who knows? Perhaps the problem is that the sauces are supposed to be available at some Whole Foods and ShopRites in the Northeast. Ah, the vagaries of trying to shop on the web.

Labels: , ,

Wednesday, October 24, 2007

 

Review: Jim's Organic Wonderbrew Coffee

A PR firm for Jim's Organic Coffee sent a pound of the company's Wonderbrew blend beans. The package calls it a lower acid coffee - a tough label in general, because there are probably no standards for this, but our tasting panel - various people hanging out for breakfast last weekend - found that it did have less bight and brightness, which is typical with lower acid coffees. Unlike others I've had, though, it didn't taste thin. If regular coffee acidity puts you off to tea, try this blend. A pound of beans bought directly from the company is $9.70, plus whatever they will charge for shipping - I'd have checked, but I would first have had to register on the company's web site, which, frankly, I found off-putting. Also, I thought it odd that the coffee packaging mentioned low acid, but that the description on the web site didn't. Sounds like it's time for a little editing.

Labels: , , , ,

Tuesday, October 23, 2007

 

Strange News from the Food Front (10/22/07)

A weekly round-up of food and drink oddities:

Labels: ,

Saturday, October 20, 2007

 

Similarities Between Seinfeld and Lapine Cookbooks - And Some Web Sites

Cookbooks rarely make the news, but a pair of them did in the New York Times. Jerry Seinfeld's wife Jessica has come out with a cookbook, "Deceptively Delicious," for the parents of fussy eaters, with suggestions for hiding healthy ingredients in foods kids will eat. An appearance on "The Oprah Winfrey Show" helped launch the title. But, apparently, publisher HarperCollins had received a proposal for a very similar book twice (author Missy Chase Lapine eventually found another publisher) before bringing out Seinfeld's, and a few of the odd recipes seem to have appeared in both:
The basic concepts for several of Ms. Lapine’s recipes — spinach in brownies, avocado in chocolate pudding and sweet potato in grilled cheese sandwiches — also appear in recipes offered by Ms. Seinfeld.

Ms. Lapine, a mother of two daughters who lives in Irvington, N.Y., said that when she compared her book with Ms. Seinfeld’s, she was “uncomfortable” seeing that “those unusual combinations that I thought would brand me as a lunatic showed up here, too.”

Ms. Seinfeld said she had not looked at “The Sneaky Chef,” but noted that any similarities were likely to have stemmed from the use of commonly accepted children’s favorites.
Perhaps they both looked on the web. As an example, after reading this article, I searched for avocado and chocolate pudding on Google. The first match was for a recipe on the web site of the California Avocado Commission, and there are other matches, like this one on KidsHealth for Parents, where the recipe was reviewed in June of 2006, or a version with carob and maple syrup here, in March 2006.

Spinach in brownies? I did a search on brownies, spinach, and then added cocoa (because there are some savory spinach "brownie" recipes). Here's one using a brownie mix, or another using a box mix from January 2006.

So, maybe the similarities aren't not coincidence, or maybe it is. Maybe they both ... found some inspiration in online research from the work of others, because not all these unusual ideas are apparently that unusual.

Labels: , ,

Thursday, October 18, 2007

 

Review: Welch's Dried Fruit and Dried Cherries

I received some samples of snacks from a PR firm working for Welch's. The first, Welch's Dried Fruit, are mixes of chopped fruit pieces. I liked the flavors - particularly the ones with bits of pineapple - but didn't like a couple of thing. One is that they add sugar to the fruit, to tone the tartness that consumers might find objectionable. The other is that you need to read the warning label about bits of nuts appearing in the snack bags. I took a nibble of some and almost chomped down on a fragment. Because the fruit is also chopped, that may make them harder to spot - especially for the younger set, at suggested by the packaging and marketing slant. A set of 9 single servings (0.9 or 1.5 ounces each) runs $3.99 suggested retail price, or you can get a 6 ounce bag.

I also received a 5.5 ounce pouch of Welch's Dried Cherries, suggested retail price of $3.99. The fruit wasn't dried as much as you might normally expect, leaving it a little softened. These I liked quite a bit, although they also add sugar to them, as well.

The company does say that a quarter pound of either product will equal one serving of fruit. Check the bag before you depend on that, because I think that 4 ounces will end up being more calories than you might realize.

Labels: , , , ,

Wednesday, October 17, 2007

 

Coke and Pepsi Battle with Beans

I was reading a Financial Times column (sorry, but you have to be a subscriber for the link to work), and read how the newest battle ground for Coke and Pepsi is coffee. The soda market is under pressure, and, presumably, so is the bottled water market, with other companies providing significant competition. So the two soda giants have moved to cold ready-to-drink (RTD) combinations of coffee and milk. Presumably, hot coffee is almost ready to drink and will be when it cools down sufficiently. Pepsi has already partnered with Starbucks, and now Coke is about to with Illy:
The Italian company’s chairman, Andrea Illy, says he is proud to be associated with Coca-Cola to offer the “Illy taste” to a new range of consumers, as well as for existing ones to experience “new consumption moments”, whatever that may mean.

Black coffee purists should be bracing themselves for dark days ahead.
Indeed.

Labels: , , , , ,

Tuesday, October 16, 2007

 

Food Reference Web Site

I came across Foodreference.com today when a publicist forwarded a note about a listing for my Complete Idiot's Guide to Pizza and Panini. I had never heard of it before, so took a look around. It's an interesting compendium, including food contest listings, book reviews (which seem more like blurbs taken from marketing literature and covers), and even culinary crossword puzzles. There are articles, cooking tips, trivia, and a food history calendar. It's certainly worth a trip to see what might interest you.

Labels: ,

Monday, October 15, 2007

 

Strange News from the Food Front (10/15/07)

A weekly round-up of food and drink oddities:

Labels: , , , ,

Friday, October 12, 2007

 

Review: Cuisinart SM-70 7 Quart Stand Mixer

I've used a 5-quart Kitchenaid stand mixer for years, most regularly for mixing doughs (came in really handy while writing my pizza and panini book), sometimes for creaming ingredients and even occasionally for whipping egg whites or cream, though I tend to do the latter two by hand more often than not. But I've found that the capacity wasn't everything that I wanted. Sometimes I'd make a large batch of bread dough, for example, and have to keep an eye on it to keep things in the bowl. So I was happy to try a test model Cuisinart SM-70 sent by the company's PR firm.

It was the 7-quart capacity that caught my eye - a large increase over the roughly 12-cups of the Kitchenaid I've used, or even that company's top-end 14-cup model. A batch of multi-grain roll dough - enough to fill a roasting pan with rolls - was dwarfed in the SM-70. You get what has become the standard attachments: whisk, paddle mixer, and dough hook for kneading. The machine handled the mixing easily and even the kneading with the dough hook, though there was a tiny bit of shaking in the machine. It's nowhere near so heavy as the Kitchenaids (extensive use of plastics instead of all metal), which means a bit less stability, but results in a unit that is also far more portable. I can lift it up to and down from the top of the fridge without a bit of problem. I do wonder whether the sturdiness will be enough to last for 10 to 15 years or more, but there's no way to tell that in the short run. However, as I said, it handled the dough easily, and that size of batch would have put a bit of strain on the Kitchenaid.

I appreciated the close fit of the whisk and paddle to the bottom of the bowl. You can also adjust them easily with a wrench (not supplied) to keep them close. The quality of that fit makes a lot of difference when you're trying to efficiently mix or whip something, because you engage pretty much all of the contents, and not just what the attachment can reach. The top tilts back to open access to the bowl that locks down into the base. I don't generally like tip-up designs in stand mixers, but I don't think Cuisinart had much choice in this case. The unit is very tall as it is, and incorporating a mechanism to raise and lower the bowl would have made it far too tall. As it is, the unit doesn't fit under our kitchen cabinets. I did like the solid feel of the latch for tilting back the head.

There are 12 speeds, to which I say so what? Like Kitchenaid, and virtually every other maker of any type of mixer, Cuisinart feels obliged to offer a lot of speeds, when, realistically, slow/medium/fast would probably be enough. The controls are electronic - not one of my favorite approaches because I find that such systems don't have the lifespan of mechanical ones, and tend to be expensive when it comes to repairs. However, if you're going electronic, might as well include a counter, which Cuisinart does, and it's a handy feature. You no longer have to watch the clock while mixing; set it and it will shut itself off. The unit also comes with a splash guard, and such should be standard equipment with any stand mixer. (Few things get as messy in cooking as flour kicked up into the air by a mixer.) You can also get option (read that as extra money) attachments for such things as juicing citrus, grinding meat, or making pasta.

Overall, I liked using it and found it a convenient way to handle larger volumes of mixing without sacrificing the ability to work with smaller amounts as well. The suggested retail of $449 also makes it one of the more reasonably-priced units you can find, particularly when considering the capacity.

Labels: , , , , ,

Thursday, October 11, 2007

 

Behind the Scenes of Gordon Ramsay

If you have any interest in Gordon Ramsay, who at least ties Emeril Lagasse for ubiquity, then take a read through this review, by Bloomberg London food critic Richard Vines, of Ramsay's new book, Gordon Ramsay's Playing with Fire. Among other observations is the importance of money from private equity firm Blackstone Group as well as Ramsay's publicist. And here I thought it might be all about the food. The book is apparently due out in the U.S. come May of next year, but if you're desperate for the read, Amazon in the U.K. has it now.

Labels: , , , ,

Tuesday, October 09, 2007

 

Review:Häagen-Dazs Sticky Toffee Pudding Ice Cream

When I reviewed Häagen-Dazs Caramelized Pear & Toasted Pecan ice cream at the end of September, I relied on a sample sent by the company's PR firm. This time my wife had picked up some Sticky Toffee Pudding, the winner of the company's 2006 flavor contest, without my knowledge and walked into the kitchen with the remnants.

She: "You should review this ice cream. It's great!"

He: "What is it?"

She: "It's got toffee and bits of cake in vanilla."

He: "OK, let me try some."

She looks darkly at He.

She: "Isn't my opinion as good as yours?"

He: "Yes, but if I'm reviewing it, I actually have to taste it."

She holds out a quarter teaspoon of ice cream.

He: "How about a little more?"

She gives me a funny look, and then holds out the spoon again - a third of a teaspoon this time. I take what I can get. She's right; this is a great flavor. Note to self: buy some and then hide it so I get at least a scoop.

Labels: , , ,

Monday, October 08, 2007

 

Strange News from the Food Front (10/8/07)

A weekly round-up of food and drink oddities:

Labels: , , , , , , ,

 

Getting Your Money Back

According to Reuters, a Noweegian food retailer is apparently making news for providing a refund if customers don't like something they've purchased. Have I walked into the Twilight Zone, or hasn't this been the standard operating procedure at American stores for, oh, decades? Certainly places like Whole Foods and Trader Joe's do this, but I've also seen supermarkets that have taken back product when there's any kind of problem. Then again, it's probably a calculated move. If somethings returned, the store can get credit from the distributor, and it's probably unlikely that people will bother to go back to the store. I still don't see how this became an interntional story, other than smart PR on the part of someone or other.

Labels: ,

Sunday, October 07, 2007

 

More on New York Times Wine Critic Eric Asimov

On Tuesday I mentioned the piece that journalist and blogger Kevin Allman ran about the potential ethical issues of Eric Asimov writing about Paley's in Portland, Ore. Allman has been keeping up with the subject. First, he did hear back from Asimov (nephew of the late Isaac Asimov, apparently), who basically emailed: a) the fact that the restaurant owner's mother teaches piano to my son is irrelevant (otherwise known as mind your own business), and b) "in retrospect" he probably shouldn't have participated in the event at Paley's that had the owner calling him a good friend. Asimov didn't answer Allman's questions. Allman sent a few additional specific questions in an email and wants to hear back from Asimov before approaching the reviewer's editor at the New York Times. And then a correction appeared. Some solid food journalism rising above appreciating a restaurant's decor or the crispness of a Cabernet.

Labels: , , , , ,

Friday, October 05, 2007

 

Review: Baker's Sto 'N Go


I dislike exclamation points, and am apt to distrust any product whose packaging and marketing makes liberal use of the punctuation. To see "Revolutionizing the Storage Container!!!" on the cardboard wrapper of the Baker's Sto 'N Go was therefore a bad omen. Luckily, mystical signs have pretty much gone the way of hieromancy. This product is a smart and overdue take on how to convey cookies, brownies, and other snacks from one place to the other. A plastic box comes with adjustable height slide-out shelves. The container, which is compact, can hold a pan of 13x9x2 inch brownies, 32 mini cupcakes, 3 dozen 3-inch cookies, or two 8-inch pies. You could also put sliced meats, cheeses, and other deli items on the shelves. A cover snaps in place over the opening, keeping the foods in and the air out. You can also turn it on end and use the shelves as dividers to hold candies, pretzels, or anything else that will fit. It's dishwasher- and even microwave-safe. When not in use, you can even slip out the carrying handle and store it inside, so it takes up less room. The price is about $20, but if you've ever juggled baking pans or plates wrapped with aluminum foil, this will seem a reasonably modest price. One thing it did leave me wishing for is something slightly larger: It would have been nice to bring two 9-inch pies, as that seems a more common size. That aside, however, if you're sending kids to school with class snacks or donating goods to a bake sale, give this strong consideration.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Thursday, October 04, 2007

 

Review: New Oreo Packaging

My family and I have nothing against Oreos. In fact, we're fond of them. One problem, though, has been the packaging. Open it, and they start turning soggy. (It's made me wonder if they're actually what is inside those little packets that are supposed to keep products dry up until you buy them.)

In the past we've put them into a Snapware container (which are great, by the way, and airtight), but the company has come out with a resealable package. You pull open a flap on the top, take out cookies, and then set it back into place, where it reseals. And it does - once or twice. But the adhesive gets gummed up with dust, stray hairs, and the rest of life's effluvia. Suddenly that flap is just ... flapping. It's probably just some gimmick that will be on for a few months before they whisk it away into the Closet of Ill-Conceived and Ill-Executed Ideas.

Labels: , ,

Wednesday, October 03, 2007

 

Judging Pickles

I spent the latter part of Sunday afternoon eating pickles. Just pickles - and the occasional wine cracker and swig of peppermint-flavored water (tasted better than I had expected). I was a judge in a pickle contest of an eastern European festival held in Deerfield, Massachusetts. When I left, it was with a few observations:

Labels: , , , ,

Tuesday, October 02, 2007

 

Blogger Questions NYT Wine Critic Eric Asimov's Impartiality

Journalist and blogger Kevin Allman is questioning some work of New York Times wine critic Eric Asimov and whether he's making a full enough disclosure.Asimov has made a couple of mentions of a Portland, Ore. restaurant called Paley's Place. Apparently the restaurant has an excellent reputation, and yet there are close relationships between the Asimov and Paley families:
Restaurateur Vitaly Paley's mother, Genya Paley, is an instructor at the Mannes College of Music, where she instructs Asimov's 15-year-old son Peter Asimov, an honors student at the school. As the younger Asimov's official biography states, "He has been a private piano pupil of Genya Paley since 2000."

When Eric Asimov was in Portland researching his article, the Paleys made him the centerpiece of one of their popular "Wine Wednesdays" dinners, sending out a press release titled "NEW YORK TIMES WINE CRITIC ERIC ASIMOV JOINS WINE WEDNESDAY AT PALEY'S PLACE" and inviting the public to meet "their good friend, Eric Asimov."
Allman questions whether - by the Times's own standards and by those of journalism in general - Asimov is too close to the Paleys to be writing about any business they own. As Allman writes:
I wondered: Does Asimov think his coverage of Paley's Place violates these rules, and did he provide full disclosure to his editor? Is the fact that he's the paper's wine critic, not its food critic, germane at all in this case?
Some excellent questions. He emailed Asimov who is traveling and said he'd respond when he had a few minutes.

Labels: , , ,

 

Review: Ocean Spray 100% Juice Cranberry & Blueberry Blend

When you live in Massachusetts, you have to like cranberries - I think there's some statute to that effect. And I do like cranberry sauce, cranberry juice mixed with orange juice, and sweetened dried cranberries. But I wasn't that taken with Ocean Spray 100% Juice Cranberry & Blueberry Blend. The drink is 100% juice, which is a great improvement over water and high fructose corn syrup. Unfortunately, although there are taste hints of blueberry and cranberry, they are relatively weak. Leading the ingredients list - which means filling most of the bottle - are apple and grape juices. This has become a standard practice, both to help tie flavors together, I think, but also to save money. I have some sympathy for the company. Cranberries don't really contain significant juice on their own, so they'd probably have to crush and steep them in something, and blueberries get a lot more expensive than apples and grapes. But the flavor is altogether too bland and undistinguished. At a suggested retail price of $3.59 for a half gallon bottle, you could serve it to the kids, and even drink it yourself, but don't expect what the label seems to promise.

Labels: , , ,

Monday, October 01, 2007

 

Strange News from the Food Front (10/1/07)

A weekly round-up of food and drink oddities:

Labels: , ,

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?