Minimal Lighting Blog
I just heard about this - Strobist is a blog by a pro photographer about how to make due with small flash units instead of investing in studio-type units that are big and heavy. It's worth checking out.
Photography and art news, reviews, and views. I'm the author of the Complete Idiot's Guide to Canon EOS Digital Cameras and a long-time photographer, writer, and amateur sketcher.
I just heard about this - Strobist is a blog by a pro photographer about how to make due with small flash units instead of investing in studio-type units that are big and heavy. It's worth checking out.
For years magazines have been using retouching methods - now Photoshop, but once using inks, dyes, brushes, and razor blades - to remake the physical appearance of people. One of the top jobs has been to make models and actresses look skinnier. Now things are on the rebound, and the directive is to make sure that no one looks too skinny, according to the Telegraph in the U.K.
Labels: magazines, Photoshop, retouching
Ever hear about pinhole photography, where a tiny opening replaces a lens and you use incredibly long exposures with virtually unlimited depth of field? Well, seems that there's a Worldwide Pinhole Photography Day coming up April 28. There are workshops being held all around the world. Time to strike a blow for obsolescence. I might just have to dig out one of my view cameras, get a pinhole attachment, and shoot some B&W, though you can make a pinhole camera out of an old oatmeal box.
Kim Komando's column had a good rundown on general rules of when you can and cannot take photos:
In the Wall Street Journal, Richard Woodward, a New York-based art critic, gives an overview of two exhibitions currently at the National Gallery: Impressed by Light: British Photographs From Paper Negatives, 1840-60 (through May 4), and In the Forest of Fontainebleau: Painters and Photographers from Corot to Monet (through June 8). The former "examines photography in the context of Victorian science, industry and colonialism" though waxed paper negatives. The latter has examples of painting and photography side-by-side. Passes are not required for either. Both sound fascinating and make me wish that the nation's capital were a bit closer.
Labels: exhibitions, museums
I came across DIYPhotography.net, which focuses on how to create your own equipment for photography. Here's a post, with links to information on pulling it off, on how to take high-speed photos. Might as well pick up a few points and then see what else you can learn.
I came across this LA Times article on Charlotte Cotton, head of photography at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art. I pass it on as an interesting read. It's always interesting to get an insight into the people who help shape the art and industry.
If you're near New York and want to catch some of the best in art photography this weekend, head to the Association of International Photography Art Dealer (>AIPAD) show, running from today through Sunday. As New York Art News notes:
More than 75 of the world’s leading fine art photography galleries will present a wide range of museum quality work by contemporary, modern and 19th century masters at the Park Avenue Armory at 67th Street and Park Avenue in New York City.Admission is $25 a day or $35 for the run of the show, and you get a catalog (which itself would cost $25, if you weren't attending). Show hours are 11AM to 7PM today, 11 to 8PM Friday and Saturday, and 11 to 6PM Sunday.
Labels: art, exhibitions
Boingboing posted about $100 remote controlled 1.3 megapixel camera that fits onto a regular pair of glasses. It's going to get hard to keep people from snapping pictures in all sorts of restricted areas.
It's easy to get stuck in taking the same sort of shots, over and over. This is different from having your own "eye," in which you express things visually in a certain way because it comes naturally from your own upbringing, education, personality, and inherent tastes. I'm talking about being in a rut. When you find that each picture seems like the last, it's time to shake yourself loose. Here are a couple of things that might help.
Labels: composition, lenses, perspective
I haven't bothered trying Photoshop Express, not only because of the potential rights I'd have to give up, but, owing to being in a rural part of the country, there's no broadband in them thar phone wires - and no cable connection to even miss broadband. And if you're going to edit photos over the Internet, dial-up is the last thing you want to contemplate. However, Washington Post writer Rob Pegorano has a review on the product. From what he says, it seems that while there are some basic abilities, this is not really close to being Photoshop, and is slow, clumsy, and buggy, at least as of early April. If you want real photo editing without spending a lot of money, here are some choices that I've covered.