<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38896438</id><updated>2008-07-25T17:37:14.708-04:00</updated><title type='text'>En Words</title><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/'/><link rel='next' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38896438/posts/default?start-index=26&amp;max-results=25'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38896438/posts/default'/><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/atom.xml'/><author><name>Erik Sherman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17255539568502457170</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>325</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38896438.post-2603963406883061498</id><published>2008-07-25T16:46:00.004-04:00</published><updated>2008-07-25T16:52:40.019-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='online'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='words'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Internet'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='definitions'/><title type='text'>New Words for New Communications</title><content type='html'>Today, the term &lt;cite&gt;blogtificate&lt;/cite&gt; came to me: the process of unloading one's unqualified opinions, unsupported by fact, into a blog because no one else wants to hear them.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That got me thinking that there must be plenty of others: &lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;imaway&lt;/strong&gt; - (adj.) When you set your Internet messaging software to away status so people will stop bothering you as you try to get something done.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;blackberryed&lt;/strong&gt; - (adj.) The state of having a Blackberry filed with so many emails that you will never be able to respond to all of them.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;iphoney&lt;/strong&gt; - (n.) A technology poseur who purchases some trendy device but hasn't yet learned how to turn it on.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;So what others can you think of? There are comments on this blog for a reason.</content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/2008/07/new-words-for-new-communications.html' title='New Words for New Communications'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=38896438&amp;postID=2603963406883061498' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38896438/posts/default/2603963406883061498'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38896438/posts/default/2603963406883061498'/><author><name>Erik Sherman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17255539568502457170</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38896438.post-2441819044840414954</id><published>2008-07-24T05:59:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-07-24T05:59:01.076-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='news'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='ethics'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='advertising'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='television'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='broadcasting'/><title type='text'>Television News Product Placement</title><content type='html'>It's the end of the journalistic world as we've known it: a &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;Las&lt;/span&gt; Vegas television station, owned by Meredith, is &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/22/business/media/22adco.html?ex=1374465600&amp;amp;en=1575a5d49565f3b7&amp;amp;ei=5124&amp;amp;partner=permalink&amp;amp;exprod=permalink" target="_blank"&gt;taking money from &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;McDonalds&lt;/span&gt; to display two cups of iced coffee&lt;/a&gt;, logos squarely facing the camera. &lt;blockquote&gt;The arrangement does raise questions about potential conflicts between the intended message and news content. The ad agency that arranged the promotion said the coffee cups would most likely be whisked away if &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;KVVU&lt;/span&gt; chooses to report a negative story about McDonald’s.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;“If there were a story going up, let’s say, God forbid, about a McDonald’s food illness outbreak or something negative about McDonald’s, I would expect that the station would absolutely give us the opportunity to pull our product off set,” said Brent Williams, account supervisor at &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;Karsh&lt;/span&gt;/Hagan, the advertising agency that arranged the deal between McDonald’s and &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4"&gt;KVVU&lt;/span&gt;.&lt;/blockquote&gt;The station claims that it will continue to report about McDonald's, removing the cups if there is a negative story, just as it would remove a commercial spot. But the problem here is that the advertising is no longer contained to identifiable segments. Product placement works on the theory of an implied endorsement by the people who are in the program in question. This is the line between &lt;em&gt;sponsorship&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;ownership&lt;/em&gt;. I wonder if the contract with the station called for a payment of 30 pieces of silver. Probably not - the going rate for integrity is somewhat higher these days.</content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/2008/07/television-news-product-placement.html' title='Television News Product Placement'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=38896438&amp;postID=2441819044840414954' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38896438/posts/default/2441819044840414954'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38896438/posts/default/2441819044840414954'/><author><name>Erik Sherman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17255539568502457170</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38896438.post-9017793927485201765</id><published>2008-07-23T04:13:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-07-23T04:13:00.647-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='newspapers'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='blogs'/><title type='text'>Reigning Snark Site Gawker Laments Reader Snark</title><content type='html'>I had to shake my head and wait for my eyes to come back to rest so I could be sure this was the same site. Yup, it was Gawker - with a comment piece on why &lt;a href="http://gawker.com/5027287/why-newspapers-shouldnt-allow-comments" target="_blank"&gt;newspapers should not allow reader comments&lt;/a&gt;. The view was so contempuous of letting the hoi polloi have a say that I was surprised, because Gawker is often one of the snidest and most condescending of sites when it comes to opinions of what others do, say, and write.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The line of argument, I felt, was poorly thought through, assumption filled, and lacking perception, understanding, and even a factual grasp on history. Referring to David Carr's piece in the New York Times Magazine about how bad he used to be and how he had changed brought out "Opening a deeply personal article up to the peanut gallery does these writers a great disservice—and yes, I include Emily Gould here, whose NYT Mag article was similarly pilloried in the comments section.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"The "offensive" comments listed were "If he wasn't a reporter for the New York Times, would we be reading this?" and "Monetizing your shameful past is disgusting. Haven't you harmed your loved ones enough for one lifetime?" and "Who cares. grow some guts. we all have problems. most of us don't blame drugs or alcohol... you want a medal for doing your job and being a father?" Sorry, but all three are perfectly respectible views, and far less harsh than things I've seen in Gawker. If a writer decides to open up his or her personal life, then that person should be smart enough, and thick-skinned enough, to know what will happen.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Certainly the single line of type "w-h-o-r-e" referring to another story is ridiculous. But to include that as if it is on the same level as the other comments is absurd. &lt;blockquote&gt;You could argue that newspapers should rigorously vet and moderate their comments, or at least require them to use their full names. I'd argue that this is a silly misuse of their time; I'm not suggesting that newspapers should actively patrol their comments, like this and some other websites do. (We're a blog; comments are in our blood.) I'm suggesting they get rid of them altogether. (This doesn't include the blog sections of various papers, which the NYT and Washington Post are stuffed full of.)&lt;/blockquote&gt;The author, signed as Sheila, suggests that newspapers "have more important things to do" than to police comments or even spend time with them. Why? Are newspapers supposed to be sacrosanct when it comes to criticism? At least with comment sections, there is a way for someone to voice an opinion when the newspaper decides that it isn't important or interesting enough to publish a letter to the editor - even if the comment is informed and makes a point important for the newspaper to hear.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ah, but I forgot, all comments in all newspapers are the same: shallow and not of the quality of &lt;em&gt;real&lt;/em&gt; writers like Sheila. Perhaps she might look at some of the blogs at the Guardian's site; the discussion in the theatre section, for one, shows an erudition and level of experience that is laudable.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As for the postscript: &lt;blockquote&gt;Also, nobody wants to hear the tired old "free speech" argument as a defense of comments. We've had free speech in this country for well over two hundred years, long before it was ever an option to comment on newspaper websites and blogs.&lt;/blockquote&gt;what hogwash. She means that &lt;em&gt;she&lt;/em&gt; doesn't want to hear about free speech because, after all, that is for the intellectuals, not the common folk. Unfortunately, Sheila is apparently unfamiliar with the quality and thrust of newspapers at the time of the founding fathers, and how they would regularly attack politicians, public figures, and each other on a regular basis. There was no need for a comments section, because the entire newspapers were just that. But it's far more convenient to ignore fact when it gets in the way of opinion.</content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/2008/07/reigning-snark-site-gawker-laments.html' title='Reigning Snark Site Gawker Laments Reader Snark'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=38896438&amp;postID=9017793927485201765' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38896438/posts/default/9017793927485201765'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38896438/posts/default/9017793927485201765'/><author><name>Erik Sherman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17255539568502457170</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38896438.post-8732130543138675965</id><published>2008-07-22T05:44:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-07-22T05:45:31.155-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='novel'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='book'/><title type='text'>Delighting in Italo Calvino</title><content type='html'>When &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italo_Calvino" target="_blank"&gt;Italo Calvino's&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;If on a winter's night a traveler ...&lt;/em&gt; came out many years ago, I remember picking it up but never reading it. Recently I noticed a copy at a used book store, so thought it was time to finally take the plunge. I'm most happy I finally did. the back cover explains that the novel actually involves ten different novels, all by "different" authors with varying styles, each story getting interrupted at a climactic point. But it's the way this happens, with an omniscient uber-narrator who addresses the stories, then becomes part of them, then addresses the character of a reader, who is and isn't you, all with a terrific and subtle sense of humor that makes &lt;em&gt;If on a winter's night&lt;/em&gt; so enjoyable. If you've never read it before, it's worth picking up a copy.</content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/2008/07/delighting-in-italo-calvino.html' title='Delighting in Italo Calvino'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=38896438&amp;postID=8732130543138675965' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38896438/posts/default/8732130543138675965'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38896438/posts/default/8732130543138675965'/><author><name>Erik Sherman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17255539568502457170</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38896438.post-8064602921739249725</id><published>2008-07-17T17:48:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-07-17T17:48:00.999-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='reviews'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='psychology'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='books'/><title type='text'>Review: The Sociopath Next Door</title><content type='html'>The concept of the book is disturbing: four percent of all people in the United States are sociopaths, meaning people who literally have no conscience and who are capable of doing anything to anyone in pursuit of what they want without regret, remorse, or even the slightest twinge of guilt. I've known people like this, you've known people like this, and it's heartening to know that you're not crazy and that people actually &lt;em&gt;do&lt;/em&gt; act outside all mores and morals. At least you aren't dreaming it. Given that the author is a psychiatrist who supposedly taught at the Harvard Medical School for 25 years (I'm not doubting her, just noting that I haven't independently checked.), she would have the intellectual and practical background to address the subject.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;From that end, I think the book is important, but I found that some of the writing itself was disappointing. For example, there are somewhat stiff phrases of quasi-academic or medical jargon that she uses repeatedly and that stick out like a sore thumb. That may be fine in a technical paper, but is stylistically out of place in a book aimed at the popular market. Also, I noticed that the author would tend to make assumptions in her explanations that didn't necessarily have enough logical basis. For example, the lack of conscience itself would not seem to be a motive for the driving need to play oneupsmanship with others. That may be a common characteristic, but it would seem to be from some other dynamic. (This is from knowing some people who would seem to be textbook sociopaths who saved their activities for going after what they wanted at the expense of all others. Crushing someone just for the sake of doing so would have been a distraction to them.) But overall, it's worth reading to at least raise the question of exactly who lives next door - or is in the next room, office, or chair.</content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/2008/07/review-sociopath-next-door.html' title='Review: The Sociopath Next Door'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=38896438&amp;postID=8064602921739249725' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38896438/posts/default/8064602921739249725'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38896438/posts/default/8064602921739249725'/><author><name>Erik Sherman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17255539568502457170</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38896438.post-2511256375609039847</id><published>2008-07-15T11:35:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2008-07-15T11:35:01.113-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='comic books'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='directors'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Internet'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='authors'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='novel'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='musicals'/><title type='text'>Joss Whedon's Three-Part-Internet-Only-Take-That-You-Villains Musical and a Review: Soon I Will Be Invincible</title><content type='html'>As a society, we must be in reaction to superheroes in comics and movies, because there is a mini-wave of takes from the super villain's viewpoint. Let's start with Joss Whedon. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;No one could reasonably claim that Joss Whedon was wed to formula. I thought the musical episode of Buffy the Vampire Slayer was brilliant (and the writing and execution of the rest of the series weren't too shabby, either). During the Writers Guild of America strike, Whedon started writing a three-part musical about a low-rent super-villain called &lt;a href="http://doctorhorrible.net/" target="_blank"&gt;Doctor Horrible&lt;/a&gt; - and they're all streaming for &lt;a href="http://www.drhorrible.com/" target="_blank"&gt;free this week only&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But what first got me thinking about super villains was the amusing &lt;a href="http://sooniwillbeinvincible.com/" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;em&gt;Soon I Will Be Invincible&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, a debut novel by Austin Grossman. The novel rests on two points of view: that of super villain Doctor Impossible, who has an IQ of 300 and rookie superhero female cyborg Fatale. And there is the battle between good and evil, with people trying to take over the world in one way or another, but it's not always clear exactly who is doing what. Addressing childhood, shame, love, lust, and the weird twists of fate that make us who we are, the book shows how sometimes the difference between one path in life and another might be a chance word, a bit of kindness, and someone understanding. My daughter wasn't too fond of the writing, though for the most part I enjoyed it, with trite comic book dialog craftily placed to create a kind of character chiaroscuro, only the contrast not being between literal light and dark, but the metaphoric public and private parts of someone's psyche that help define the whole person. There were times that I thought the story got badly out of hand - for example, one character realizes the real identity of another and states it, when a hint would have done the trick and left one area of tension and suspense for resolution at the end for greater effect. But overall, worth the read and a book I can recommend. Check the link for an excerpt and pointer to where you can get a copy.</content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/2008/07/joss-whedons-three-part-internet-only.html' title='Joss Whedon&apos;s Three-Part-Internet-Only-Take-That-You-Villains Musical and a Review: Soon I Will Be Invincible'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=38896438&amp;postID=2511256375609039847' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38896438/posts/default/2511256375609039847'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38896438/posts/default/2511256375609039847'/><author><name>Erik Sherman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17255539568502457170</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38896438.post-7066258439627839967</id><published>2008-07-14T05:57:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-07-14T05:57:00.276-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='quotations'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='religion'/><title type='text'>Serenity Missing in Considering Serenity Prayer</title><content type='html'>The Serenity Prayer is short and insightful, whose opening is well known:&lt;blockquote&gt;God grant me the serenity &lt;br /&gt;to accept the things I cannot change; &lt;br /&gt;the courage to change the things I can;&lt;br /&gt;and the wisdom to know the difference.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Prostestant theologian Reinhold Niebuhr claimed to have written it, but there seems to be a &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/11/us/11prayer.html?ex=1373515200&amp;en=7031a4f0f5f1b93b&amp;ei=5124&amp;partner=permalink&amp;exprod=permalink" target="_blank"&gt;significant question of whether he was right&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;blockquote&gt;Now, a law librarian at Yale, using new databases of archival documents, has found newspaper clippings and a book from as far back as 1936 that quote close versions of the prayer. The quotations are from civic leaders all over the United States — a Y.W.C.A. leader in Syracuse, a public school counselor in Oklahoma City — and are always, interestingly, by women. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Some refer to the prayer as if it were a proverb, while others appear to claim it as their own poetry. None attribute the prayer to a particular source. And they never mention Reinhold Niebuhr.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/2008/07/serenity-missing-in-considering.html' title='Serenity Missing in Considering Serenity Prayer'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=38896438&amp;postID=7066258439627839967' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38896438/posts/default/7066258439627839967'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38896438/posts/default/7066258439627839967'/><author><name>Erik Sherman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17255539568502457170</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38896438.post-734372813909991881</id><published>2008-07-11T07:39:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-07-11T07:39:00.978-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='estate'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='executor'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Kafka'/><title type='text'>Kafka Must Be Laughing From the Grave</title><content type='html'>I mentioned the other day that it was the 125th anniversary of Franz Kafka's birthday and that &lt;a href="http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/2008/07/happy-birthday-franz-kafka-you-old.html" target="_blank"&gt;he had a much more humorous view&lt;/a&gt; of his work than do most of the high school and college teachers and professors who regularly hold forth on the literary enigma. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Guardian is running a story about the secretary of Kafka's literary executor had horded parts of the writer's literary estate that the executor, Max Brod, had smuggled out of Prague before the Nazis could grab it. But she hadn't been forthcoming and had pretty much refused to let anyone see the material, including a publisher that had given her a five-figure sum in the 1980s to publish Brod's own diaries. The Israeli government has been after the documents as an important part of Jewish heritage, but even if they are made available, there may be some disappointments:&lt;blockquote&gt;But authorities in Tel Aviv have warned that the papers, with their high sulphuric acid content, may have stood up poorly to conditions in Hoffe's damp flat in the centre of Tel Aviv and to the hordes of cats and dogs which she kept until two years ago when health inspectors intervened after neighbours complained about the stench.&lt;/blockquote&gt;It's not a man turning into a giant bug, but it's pretty funny, if your humor turns toward the charred.</content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/2008/07/kafka-must-be-laughing-from-grave.html' title='Kafka Must Be Laughing From the Grave'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=38896438&amp;postID=734372813909991881' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38896438/posts/default/734372813909991881'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38896438/posts/default/734372813909991881'/><author><name>Erik Sherman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17255539568502457170</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38896438.post-2828716970836611746</id><published>2008-07-10T10:05:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-07-10T10:05:07.888-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='writers'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='blogs'/><title type='text'>Death of a Photo Blog and Why Writers Stop</title><content type='html'>One of my favorite blogs is called A Photo Editor - smart, informed, to the point, and interesting. Owner Rob Haggart has an &lt;a href="http://aphotoeditor.com/2008/07/09/whats-up-with-alec-soth/" target="_blank"&gt;interview with a former photo blogger&lt;/a&gt;, Alec Soth, who gave up the writing for a number of reasons that are interesting:&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;It stopped being a creative outlet and became another "business."&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;So many people wanted something from him that he couldn't keep up.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;It began to affect his real life relationships.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;It's interesting to see the pressures that can come about even when you want to write something for your own enjoyment.</content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/2008/07/death-of-photo-blog-and-why-writers.html' title='Death of a Photo Blog and Why Writers Stop'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=38896438&amp;postID=2828716970836611746' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38896438/posts/default/2828716970836611746'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38896438/posts/default/2828716970836611746'/><author><name>Erik Sherman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17255539568502457170</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38896438.post-5427199500454965257</id><published>2008-07-09T06:38:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-07-09T06:38:00.689-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='recommendations'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='marketing'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='books'/><title type='text'>Getting a Book Recommendation</title><content type='html'>There are a number of sites that recommend music or videos, based on what you already like. Apparently &lt;a href="http://beta.booklamp.org/" target="_blank"&gt;someone has been trying the same with books&lt;/a&gt;. He had been pursuing a number of potential &lt;a href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2008/03/19/google-stalker-reveals-secret-project/" target="_blank"&gt;business partners for a year&lt;/a&gt;, but now apparently there is a &lt;a href="http://beta.booklamp.org/forum/index.php/topic,166.0.html" target="_blank"&gt;real contract with a real client&lt;/a&gt; that will provide "a great deal of potential data to work with," rather than the 207 mostly science fiction novels that have driven the research. I wonder if everyone will be told to try Dune?</content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/2008/07/getting-book-recommendation.html' title='Getting a Book Recommendation'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=38896438&amp;postID=5427199500454965257' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38896438/posts/default/5427199500454965257'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38896438/posts/default/5427199500454965257'/><author><name>Erik Sherman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17255539568502457170</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38896438.post-9105704213806282478</id><published>2008-07-08T05:52:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-07-08T05:52:01.131-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='censorship'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='literature'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Orwell'/><title type='text'>Welcome to the Internet, Eric Blair</title><content type='html'>For those to whom the name in the headline is unfamiliar, you might recognize the associated alias: George Orwell. But whichever you use, it would be handy to remember his anti-Utopia 1984, because a &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/07/business/media/07link.html?ex=1373083200&amp;en=fab754d18f33bb9e&amp;ei=5124&amp;partner=permalink&amp;exprod=permalink" target="_blank"&gt;recent spat on the blog Boing-Bloing&lt;/a&gt; is making it practically relevant. You can check the link for the quasi-sordid details (one of the involved parties is a sex columnist of notably ribald sensibilities), but after some kind of falling out, one of Boing-Boing's bloggers removed all mention of the other woman's pen name. The New York Times passed on some interesting questions from the blog's readers:&lt;blockquote&gt;But the Boing Boing readership certainly viewed it as an act taken on behalf of the Web site. Was Boing Boing deceiving its loyal audience by silently deleting the material, even if no one noticed the absences until a year later? What does it even mean to deceive an audience when it comes to a catalog of one’s personal writings? And does popularity convey different responsibilities to the people who produce a Web site?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The twist, of course, is that for nearly everyone who lives with what the Internet says about them, being unpublished would seem a dream come true. Those photographs from the frat party can be unpublished? Who knew? The essay to the Mickey Mouse Fan Club, too?&lt;/blockquote&gt;How about a few steps further. What if there comes a time when more and more people relied on the Internet and not books, newspapers, and magazines? And what if, unlike more permanent forms of publishing, all that information could be whisked away in a moment? Such an ability would make the Ministry of Truth's job a breeze. Forbid caching sites (like the &lt;a href="http://www.archive.org/web/web.php" target="_blank"&gt;Wayback Machine&lt;/a&gt;) and trust that over time, people would succumb to laziness and simply look online for the most authoritative and "latest" information. Doesn't sound that much different from today, does it?</content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/2008/07/welcome-to-internet-eric-blair.html' title='Welcome to the Internet, Eric Blair'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=38896438&amp;postID=9105704213806282478' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38896438/posts/default/9105704213806282478'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38896438/posts/default/9105704213806282478'/><author><name>Erik Sherman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17255539568502457170</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38896438.post-6555902366748586874</id><published>2008-07-07T06:55:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-07-07T06:55:00.912-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Italy'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='religion'/><title type='text'>Confessing to False Confessions: Fake Priest Hears Confessions in St. Peter's Basilica</title><content type='html'>The Vatican has taken steps to stop an impostor, donning priestly vestments, from ensconcing himself in a confessional at the famous St. Peter's Basilica and &lt;a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080705/od_afp/vaticanpopefraudoffbeat_080705175059;_ylt=AsSF1z4Pbn6ncIfEv4ta4jCgOrgF" target="_blank"&gt;listening to people confessing their sins&lt;/a&gt;.</content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/2008/07/confessing-to-false-confessions-fake.html' title='Confessing to False Confessions: Fake Priest Hears Confessions in St. Peter&apos;s Basilica'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=38896438&amp;postID=6555902366748586874' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38896438/posts/default/6555902366748586874'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38896438/posts/default/6555902366748586874'/><author><name>Erik Sherman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17255539568502457170</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38896438.post-8180839219948560353</id><published>2008-07-04T05:57:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-07-04T05:57:20.626-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='newspapers'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='history'/><title type='text'>History through the Times</title><content type='html'>Someone on a writers' site pointed this out, and so I pass on the tip. The archive of the Times of London - starting 1 January 1785 (yes, that is a 7) - is &lt;a href="http://archive.timesonline.co.uk/tol/archive/" target="_blank"&gt;available for free online&lt;/a&gt;. You can choose any date, or there is a scrolling "timeline" listing historically and culturally interesting (or curious) events.</content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/2008/07/history-through-times.html' title='History through the Times'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=38896438&amp;postID=8180839219948560353' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38896438/posts/default/8180839219948560353'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38896438/posts/default/8180839219948560353'/><author><name>Erik Sherman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17255539568502457170</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38896438.post-1921239979449869031</id><published>2008-07-03T17:15:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-07-03T17:15:15.213-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='comedy'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Kafka'/><title type='text'>Happy Birthday, Franz Kafka - You Old Joker</title><content type='html'>Kafka would have been 125 today, and in all the years since the end of his short life, he's gotten a bum rap as dark and humorless. Yet, when I read the Metamorphosis some years ago, I found it hilarious ... in a black comic way, of course. Here's a guy who's spent his whole life trying to be and do what everyone else would not, eating the emotional refuse of the world, and he turns into a giant bug. A friend of mine at the time told me that Kafka actually saw a lot of his work as humor.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It seems that &lt;a href="http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/books/2008/07/post_26.html" target="_blank"&gt;others think so as well&lt;/a&gt;. An entry in the Guardian's book blog goes into this very issue:&lt;blockquote&gt;Kafka's friend, Max Brod, talked of how Kafka found humour in his dark works - especially the chilling "The Trial", which he thought a hoot, laughing so hard while reading the first chapter aloud, that he repeatedly had to stop to collect himself.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He revelled in the comic absurdity of his characters, whether the trapeze artist who never descends, the hunger artist who starves himself to death or the boy who wakes up to discover he has turned into a beetle. "It's terribly funny in a very direct way," says Hans-Gerd Koch, another Kafka specialist. "Gregor Samsa [in The Metamorphosis] turns into a beetle who crawls along the wall and tries to work out how he should pack his suitcase."&lt;/blockquote&gt;See? How could anyone take that overly seriously?</content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/2008/07/happy-birthday-franz-kafka-you-old.html' title='Happy Birthday, Franz Kafka - You Old Joker'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=38896438&amp;postID=1921239979449869031' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38896438/posts/default/1921239979449869031'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38896438/posts/default/1921239979449869031'/><author><name>Erik Sherman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17255539568502457170</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38896438.post-1935282131912544105</id><published>2008-07-03T05:44:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-07-03T05:44:13.619-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='U.K.'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='marketing'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='bookstore'/><title type='text'>London Bookstores Are Going Up</title><content type='html'>It seems that some independent books stores have started in London over the last few years and, contrary to "smart" opinions, are &lt;a href="http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/books/2008/07/how_an_independent_bookshop_ca.html" target="_blank"&gt;having some success&lt;/a&gt;, according to a blog in the Guardian by one bookstore person: &lt;blockquote&gt;Each independent has its own survival strategy. Ours has been to stock not just those titles our core customers would expect to find, but to second-guess those customers and offer books to surprise and excite them (what Gabriel Zaid calls "a fortunate encounter"). That in itself is not enough, which is why we set out from the very beginning to establish an involved community, both through participation in events and by opening the London Review Cake Shop, which has become a favourite haunt of writers, journalists, publishers, academics (it helps being in Bloomsbury) and, of course, customers.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Of particular note are the activities of the London Review Bookstore, including events, a revamped web site (with soon to be available podcasts of talks), catalogs, and signed first editions. Some of this actually sounds like marketing techniques used in New York's old Book Row (interestingly covered in a volume I've been reading, &lt;a href="http://search.barnesandnoble.com/Book-Row/Marvin-Mondlin/e/9780786716524?sourceid=Q000000630" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;em&gt;Book Row: An Anecdotal and Pictorial History of the Antiquarian Book Trade&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;). Sometimes what went around should come back for another tour.</content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/2008/07/london-bookstores-are-going-up.html' title='London Bookstores Are Going Up'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=38896438&amp;postID=1935282131912544105' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38896438/posts/default/1935282131912544105'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38896438/posts/default/1935282131912544105'/><author><name>Erik Sherman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17255539568502457170</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38896438.post-814994413920851791</id><published>2008-07-02T06:34:00.004-04:00</published><updated>2008-07-02T06:34:00.759-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='U.K.'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='theater'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='playwrights'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='directors'/><title type='text'>Theatrical Civility in English Blog</title><content type='html'>I first started to read a &lt;a href="http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/theatre/2008/06/finding_true_direction.html" target="_blank"&gt;Guardian theatre blog entry by director Raz Shaw&lt;/a&gt; because the question of whether you need life "experience" to write or direct certain plays has an interest to me. And I would tend to agree with Mr. Shaw that it should not be a necessity if only because we then reduce theater to formulaic naturalism and start down a road of insisting that the the lead of &lt;em&gt;A Man for All Seasons&lt;/em&gt; be a highly-religious and brilliant statesman, lawyer, and thinker. To insist on the literal is to turn our backs on unexpected insight from someone outside a given milieu.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And then, on a whim, I scrolled down to the comments. They were civil, informed, and well-reasoned. At least as of when I read them, there is an example of what online discourse could be, rather than the all too frequent taunts, put-downs, and even intimidation. How refreshing.</content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/2008/07/theatrical-civility-in-english-blog.html' title='Theatrical Civility in English Blog'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=38896438&amp;postID=814994413920851791' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38896438/posts/default/814994413920851791'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38896438/posts/default/814994413920851791'/><author><name>Erik Sherman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17255539568502457170</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38896438.post-847672724317502854</id><published>2008-07-01T06:43:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-07-01T06:43:37.488-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='radio'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='government'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='television'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='broadcasting'/><title type='text'>Smile, Dammit</title><content type='html'>Romania has passed legislation mandating that &lt;a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080625/od_afp/romaniamediaoffbeat_080625192254;_ylt=AvHXLtTJowQrWnxZnYocWAegOrgF" target="_blank"&gt;half of all newscasts must be upbeat news&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;blockquote&gt;The measure is the idea of two senators -- one from the governing National Liberal Party, the other from the far-right Great Romania party -- who bemoan the "irreversible effect" of negative news "on the health and life of people".&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Its aim, they said, is to "improve the general climate and to offer to the public the chance to have balanced perceptions on daily life, mentally and emotionally".&lt;/blockquote&gt;Clearly the change should be easy - move all actions of the legislature for the sadly real to the patently and laughably ridiculous column.</content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/2008/07/smile-dammit.html' title='Smile, Dammit'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=38896438&amp;postID=847672724317502854' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38896438/posts/default/847672724317502854'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38896438/posts/default/847672724317502854'/><author><name>Erik Sherman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17255539568502457170</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38896438.post-7421290823146878423</id><published>2008-06-30T06:14:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-06-30T06:14:02.475-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='social networking'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='email'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='business'/><title type='text'>An I.B.M.'er Learns the Joys of Forgetting Email</title><content type='html'>Luis Suarez is a "social computing evangelist" for I.B.M. that in the New York Times &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/29/jobs/29pre.html?ex=1372392000&amp;amp;en=83a8354db3e2ce9e&amp;amp;ei=5124&amp;amp;partner=permalink&amp;amp;exprod=permalink" target="_blank"&gt;about cutting back on email&lt;/a&gt;. Instead? He largely used social networks, the telephone, and even occasional trips to someone else's desk. Sorry, but it sounds as though he largely substituted other forms of electronic communication, each with its own strengths and limitations. But I guess you have to consider the atmosphere in which he works and lives: &lt;blockquote&gt;I started this experiment by announcing my intention on a couple of blogs, like my personal one and blogs inside I.B.M.’s firewall. The postings in response were overwhelmingly positive — but I also encountered some skepticism. Many people wondered how I would manage to communicate and collaborate with my peers without using e-mail.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Good gravy, Gretel, how ever do you think he's know what we're saying if he doesn't click Reply? Pardon my cynicism, but to me this is a pretty lightweight piece. Either try completely foregoing email or not, but this is the "email lite" program, and not terribly interesting.</content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/2008/06/ibmer-learns-joys-of-forgetting-email.html' title='An I.B.M.&apos;er Learns the Joys of Forgetting Email'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=38896438&amp;postID=7421290823146878423' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38896438/posts/default/7421290823146878423'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38896438/posts/default/7421290823146878423'/><author><name>Erik Sherman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17255539568502457170</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38896438.post-366468868664056105</id><published>2008-06-27T10:20:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-06-27T10:20:00.913-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='books'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='history'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='authors'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='literature'/><title type='text'>The Thoughtful Side of Cassanova</title><content type='html'>The Guardian has an article on a &lt;a href="http://books.guardian.co.uk/departments/biography/story/0,,2287894,00.html?gusrc=rss&amp;amp;feed=10" target="_blank"&gt;new biography of Cassanova&lt;/a&gt;. Some newly reopened archives in Prague are providing food for literal thought. Aside from Cassanova's legendary amorous adventures (which included a few men as well as women, supposedly), he was an otherwise busy man: &lt;blockquote&gt;In addition to the vast History of My Life, he wrote a total of 42 books and plays, including a translation of the Iliad, a five-volume science-fiction novel, mathematical treatises and opera libretti. He was also a committed follower of the Kabbalah, the mystical Jewish cult holding a deep fascination for him to the extent that he attributed his life's successes to its power.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/2008/06/thoughtful-side-of-cassanova.html' title='The Thoughtful Side of Cassanova'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=38896438&amp;postID=366468868664056105' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38896438/posts/default/366468868664056105'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38896438/posts/default/366468868664056105'/><author><name>Erik Sherman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17255539568502457170</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38896438.post-5680938437968039927</id><published>2008-06-26T08:20:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-06-26T08:34:56.258-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='editors'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='magazine'/><title type='text'>A Picture Is Worth All the Words on the Covers (and Between Them)</title><content type='html'>There's a great piece on the &lt;a href="http://aphotoeditor.com/2008/06/24/who-should-we-put-on-the-cover/" target="_blank"&gt;blog of Rob Haggart&lt;/a&gt;, a photography director, about how magazines now go about choosing what goes on the cover, from the headlines and come-ons to the almost inevitable celebrity. Here's a taste that shows you how insane the editorial process has become: &lt;blockquote&gt;I look forward to the day when magazines can return to serving their audience and not the newsstand. Until then you’re stuck with 109, free, biggest, hot, ultimate, travel, toys, secrets, great, perfect, best, sex, abs, weight-loss, getaway, new, insider, easy, delicious, shortcuts, paired with a celebrity you keep seeing over and over on the covers of magazines.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Perhaps it's time for people to write (alright, email) editors and demand an end to the tripe, because I really wonder how well they sell, and whether the magazines even try to see if they can understand their readers, or if they just assume that they already know, so there's little reason to experiment or - gasp! - talk to the great mass of us unwashed.</content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/2008/06/picture-is-worth-all-words-on-covers.html' title='A Picture Is Worth All the Words on the Covers (and Between Them)'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=38896438&amp;postID=5680938437968039927' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38896438/posts/default/5680938437968039927'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38896438/posts/default/5680938437968039927'/><author><name>Erik Sherman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17255539568502457170</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38896438.post-1876243316596406181</id><published>2008-06-25T08:47:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-06-25T08:58:39.369-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='writers'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='newspapers'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='ghostwriter'/><title type='text'>Journalists Outsourcing Their Own Work</title><content type='html'>There are days I end up scratching my head, wondering what could possibly happen next. And then I get my answer. Today, it's in the form of a newspaper columnist in Texas who has just resigned because the person who had been doing some ghostwriting for him finally asked the editor for a byline. Here's a bit form the &lt;a href="http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/books/2008/06/the_peculiar_world_of_ghostwri.html" target="_blank"&gt;story that ran in the Guardian&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;blockquote&gt;On &lt;a href="http://www.ramiroburr.com/" target="_blank"&gt;his own blog&lt;/a&gt;, Burr tried to write the scandal off as a case of his being "a little overzealous"- which is an interesting way of describing getting someone else to do your work for you.&lt;/blockquote&gt;This, to me, is like becoming a shoemaker, and then hiring someone else to make the shoes for you because you get tired of doing so. Why bother to keep doing it?</content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/2008/06/journalists-outsourcing-their-own-work.html' title='Journalists Outsourcing Their Own Work'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=38896438&amp;postID=1876243316596406181' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38896438/posts/default/1876243316596406181'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38896438/posts/default/1876243316596406181'/><author><name>Erik Sherman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17255539568502457170</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38896438.post-6092536055443820011</id><published>2008-06-24T05:10:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-06-24T05:10:01.047-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='news'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='books'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='bookstore'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='publishing'/><title type='text'>Print While You Wait: Bookstores and Print-On-Demand</title><content type='html'>Blackwell's, a so-called high-street bookseller in London, &lt;a href="http://books.guardian.co.uk/news/articles/0,,2286818,00.html?gusrc=rss&amp;amp;feed=10" target="_blank"&gt;will be installing book printing machines throughout its 60 stores&lt;/a&gt; in the UK, according to the Guardian. The current speed is 40 pages per minute, but a new model expected later this year should double the speed. Imagine wanting any of a million books and waiting 7 to 10 minutes to get what you want. It sure beats express shipping.</content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/2008/06/print-while-you-wait-bookstores-and.html' title='Print While You Wait: Bookstores and Print-On-Demand'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=38896438&amp;postID=6092536055443820011' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38896438/posts/default/6092536055443820011'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38896438/posts/default/6092536055443820011'/><author><name>Erik Sherman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17255539568502457170</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38896438.post-4332325158957415195</id><published>2008-06-23T09:35:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2008-06-23T09:54:04.089-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='obituary'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='comedy'/><title type='text'>R.I.P. George Carlin</title><content type='html'>The comic who focused on social satire and a general disappointment with the species died last night of heart failure at 71. His routine "7 words you can't say on television" actually held literary legal weight. It actually became the official list of what broadcasters could not permit out over the air: &lt;blockquote&gt;Yeah, there are 400,000 words in the English language, and there are seven of them that you can't say on television. What a ratio that is. 399,993 to seven. They must really be bad. &lt;/blockquote&gt;Seeing them in print doesn't do them justice, because Carlin was a spoken word artist. It was the rhythms, the emphasis, the tones that helped make the routines so funny. Here's a &lt;a href="http://www.erenkrantz.com/Humor/SevenDirtyWords.shtml" target="_blank"&gt;link to the text of the original routine&lt;/a&gt;. But if you'd like to hear him, &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BTyzTJTNhNk" target="_blank"&gt;try this Youtube link&lt;/a&gt;.</content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/2008/06/rip-george-carlin.html' title='R.I.P. George Carlin'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=38896438&amp;postID=4332325158957415195' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38896438/posts/default/4332325158957415195'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38896438/posts/default/4332325158957415195'/><author><name>Erik Sherman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17255539568502457170</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38896438.post-4895641348199170931</id><published>2008-06-19T06:22:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2008-06-19T06:22:01.811-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='journalism'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='hoax'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='magazine'/><title type='text'>Scientific Journal Gets Hoodwinked</title><content type='html'>The journal Materials Today in its July/August issue is running an opinion piece about "evidence" that Thomas Edison was involved in the murder of a rival. But &lt;a href="http://www.eriksherman.com/photo/" target="_blank"&gt;a closer read&lt;/a&gt; shows that the victim was more likely Materials Today. This is a post I did a couple of days ago on my photography blog (as the topic was movie technology), but I thought that people here might find it interesting.</content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/2008/06/scientific-journal-gets-hoodwinked.html' title='Scientific Journal Gets Hoodwinked'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=38896438&amp;postID=4895641348199170931' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38896438/posts/default/4895641348199170931'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38896438/posts/default/4895641348199170931'/><author><name>Erik Sherman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17255539568502457170</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38896438.post-4603466424788135505</id><published>2008-06-18T05:57:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-06-18T06:08:59.533-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='books'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='libraries'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='authors'/><title type='text'>How Many Libraries Is Your Author In?</title><content type='html'>Someone on a writers' board pointed out this resource: a &lt;a href="http://orlabs.oclc.org/Identities/" target="_blank"&gt;site that purports to tell you&lt;/a&gt; in how many libraries you can find the work of a given author. I have no idea how accurate this is, but it's amusing, none the less.</content><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/2008/06/how-many-libraries-is-your-author-in.html' title='How Many Libraries Is Your Author In?'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=38896438&amp;postID=4603466424788135505' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.eriksherman.com/enwords/atom.xml' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38896438/posts/default/4603466424788135505'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/38896438/posts/default/4603466424788135505'/><author><name>Erik Sherman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17255539568502457170</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author></entry></feed>